Recent Comments
Scott a Harris on What philosophers do Francisco on Hegelian vs. Kuhnian idea… Jess M on On the Other Delphic Maxi… Howie on The Problem of Disenchant… Howie on Living in the light of ne… Categories
- 3QD essays
- Books
- Fun with Jerry
- Historical episodes
- Items of the academy / learning
- Kant and/or Hume
- Machines / gadgets / technology / games
- Meanings of life / death / social & moral stuff
- Metaphysical musings
- Music
- Nietzsche
- Phonograph records
- Spinoza
- Stacks of Books
- This & that in the life of CH
- Uncategorized
-
Recent Posts
Blog Stats
- 175,748 hits
Meta
Monthly Archives: May 2014
Monod, Solomon’s Secret Arts
Paul Kléber Monod, Solomon’s Secret Arts: The occult in the age of enlightenment (Yale UP 2013). In 1650, scientific thinking could not be separated from fascination for alchemy, astrology, witchcraft, spell casting, and prophecy – for short, “the occult”. By 1815, … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Historical episodes
Leave a comment
On solitary confinement and social media
Last month (April 19, 2014), 3QD’s Robin Varghese linked to an article by philosopher Lisa Guenther on the effects of solitary confinement on the mind. (The original article was published in the online magazine Aeon.) Guenther’s essay is fascinating, as it … Continue reading
On Neil deGrasse Tyson and philosophical philistinism
A recent post on the internet has outed Neil deGrasse Tyson (or “NdGT,” as he’s been dubbed by the blogosphere) as a philistine in matters of philosophy. True enough: as charismatic as he is, and as beneficial as his public … Continue reading
Posted in Items of the academy / learning
13 Comments
Anthony Pagden, The Enlightenment and why it still matters
Anthony Pagden, The Enlightenment and why it still matters (Random House, 2013) The overall purpose of the book is to describe the Enlightenment as an intellectual phenomenon, a matter of ideas being thought and books being written, published, and read. … Continue reading
Posted in Books, Historical episodes
3 Comments
More musings on Humean causality
We expect that causal laws will be the same across all experience. Hume famously claims that this expectation is grounded neither in pure reason nor in experience. Not pure reason: for one can posit a cause and deny the effect … Continue reading
Posted in Kant and/or Hume
2 Comments