Stacks of Books

stacks-of-books-picThe best thing about being a university professor is that I get the chance to read broadly, think about the ideas I stumble across, bring them up in classes, and think about ways to share them with others. If I really want to think through a set of ideas, I write an essay: that way, I’m forced to put my enthusiasm and puzzlement into words, which usually leads to more ideas and questions I hadn’t considered. I’m hoping some readers might be interested in these essays – hence, the Stacks of Books series. I hope you like them. If you do, let me know; or, if you’d like to read an essay on some other topic, please feel free to suggest it!

The essays cost one buck at Amazon, and are delivered to you in a Kindle format. Part of me feels guilty in charging for essays. Another part of me likes some pocket change for the occasional cup of coffee. Since I have a need for coffee – for I am little more than an engine that turns coffee into words and pee – this second side wins.

I should add, by the way, that the essays in the series are numbered (#1, #2, etc), but you don’t have to read them in order. (Or at all, in point of fact.)

(click on the book covers below to be taken to the Amazon page.)


What makes us think we wouldn’t be better off as barbarians? Maybe it’s reason that tells us to settle down, make compromises, and enjoy a safer life? Or is it in our nature to be in a community, making plans with others? Or might justice be valuable in and of itself? Inventing Justice explores these possibilities through the philosophies of Plato and Aristotle, with lucid explanations and vivid examples.




Eternity has a way of sucking us in. We might try being thoroughly rational about it, but we still end up trying to see how all things fit together from an eternal perspective. Or, if we’re religious, we struggle to express the depths of divine eternity – while wondering whether we might be deceiving ourselves. To View From Eternity examines the profound contest between Athens and Jerusalem – between the mind of western rationality, and the heart of revealed religion.



Do we really want to know ourselves? When we try, do we find reason at our core? Or is the truth a bit less flattering? In Doubts, we see what happens when we develop our reason to the point where, if reason wants to be – well, rational – then it shouldn’t take itself so seriously. Along the way we run into Aristophanes, Stanley Kubrick, Hume, Dostoyevsky, and contemporary philosopher Peter Sloterdijk.



world-as-ideaDo we ever experience anything other than our own minds? The philosophical idealists, from Kant to Kuhn, argued that we never see the world itself – we only encounter our ideas of it. This seems plausible; but, then again, how can we say this while knowing that sometimes our ideas are wrong, and that reality often complains loudly against our beliefs? What happens, in other words, when the idealist trips on the carpet?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s