Denying the existence of the material world never goes down well. No matter how clever and compelling the arguments, most of us want to insist that matter exists – and as our insistence becomes more vehement, we start pounding tables, as if that will impress our interlocutors.
-
Join 713 other subscribers
Recent Comments
Huenemann on Some AI art Dave Wilkison on Some AI art ld on Some AI art Huenemann on Knowledge for Humans ~eric. on Knowledge for Humans Categories
- 3QD essays
- Books
- Fun with Jerry
- Historical episodes
- Items of the academy / learning
- Kant and/or Hume
- Machines / gadgets / technology / games
- Meanings of life / death / social & moral stuff
- Metaphysical musings
- Music
- Nietzsche
- Phonograph records
- Spinoza
- Stacks of Books
- This & that in the life of CH
- Uncategorized
-
Recent Posts
Blog Stats
- 220,454 hits
Meta
I like your name for this. As some commenters on your article have already said, this sounds like Fichte’s view in the Jena versions of the Wissenschaftslehre. But, as you probably already know, this is also basically the view of the external world put forward by the pragmatists William James and F.C.S. Schiller — the world is simply whatever resists my activity (conceptual or practical).
LikeLike