-
Book review: why the Enlightenment still matters
Book review by Ollie Cussan of Pagden, The Enlightenment and why it still matters, in Prospect: The Enlightenment’s great achievement, Pagden argues, was to repair the bonds of mankind. Its distinctive feature was not that it held history, nature, theology and political authority to the scrutiny of reason, as most of its critics and many… Continue reading
-
What philosophers do
The following is an excerpt from an essay I’m working on, meant to explain to non-philosophers what it is philosophers do. Philosophy is the search for wisdom, and wisdom has two large components: what is (or “the True”), and what is valuable (or “the Good”). To be wise, you need not only to have skills… Continue reading
-
Potted plants vs. forests
Neal Gabler, over a year ago, in the NYT: The post-idea world has been a long time coming, and many factors have contributed to it. There is the retreat in universities from the real world, and an encouragement of and reward for the narrowest specialization rather than for daring — for tending potted plants rather… Continue reading
-
The world of Anathem
In the beginning, Father Cnoüs had a dream. What it really was is anyone’s guess, but his two daughters interpreted it in different ways. Hylaea believed she saw a world of perfect forms, the intellect’s heaven. Deät believed she saw a world ruled by an imperial deity and his angels – I don’t know whose… Continue reading
-
Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle
One of my summer projects has been to read Neal Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle. It’s a three-volume set which includes eight separate novels he wrote and then combined. I’m a touch intimidated by even trying to summarize, but here goes. The saga ranges over the years 1640-1714 (roughly), following three principal characters: Daniel Waterhouse, a British… Continue reading
-
Wolff, The Ideal of the University
“And I for one will break a lance for the theory of the great tradition at least as one element in an undergraduate curriculum. We deal here in matters of intellectual taste, about which there is much disputing, but no deciding. I cannot truthfully claim that men are inevitably spiritually crippled by their unfamiliarity with… Continue reading
-
Kitcher’s view on science & the humanities
There has been a lot of discussion recently about the topic – most of it myopic, in my estimation – but Philip Kitcher, in an essay in the New Republic, contributes a perspective that is informed, clear, and judicious. As usual. Excerpt, from the conclusion: We are finite beings, and so our investigations have to… Continue reading
-
Comments on a couple of nonphilosophers doing some philosophy
Believe me when I say I am not one of those narrow-minded disciplinarians who believe knowledgeable people should stick to their own turf and never meddle in other people’s business. Indeed, one of my chief disappointments is that we live in a time when so few people are willing to let their attention and intellect… Continue reading
-
Hume, the mind, and the world
(Reflections on Peter Kail’s Projection and Realism in Hume’s Philosophy. Oxford, 2007.) The main point of this book is to understand what Hume thinks we “project” upon the world, and what Hume thinks really does exist apart from our perceptions. In the first part, Kail shows that Hume’s account of how we come to believe… Continue reading